Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 12/96 AI generated

Civil appeal on costs dismissed as inadmissible because it does not end proceedings.

Case Number II UZ 12/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal regarding a decision on litigation costs. The lower court rejected the appeal, ruling that a decision on costs is not a final procedural order but rather addresses incidental matters. The Supreme Court agreed, noting that such decisions do not terminate the main proceedings and thus fall outside the scope of permissible cassation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: A decision on litigation costs does not end proceedings in the sense of the law and is therefore inadmissible for cassation.

Keywords

AI generated
litigation costs cassation inadmissibility incidental matters final procedural order civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 392 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 5 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 11 ust. 3 of the Act of 1 March 1996 on amending the Civil Procedure Code

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text