Supreme Court dismissed cassation regarding social security pension denial based on insufficient work period evidence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Krystyna S. against the Social Insurance Office's denial of her pension due to an insufficient 20-year work record. The lower courts rejected the applicant's claim that she worked in her in-laws' farm, citing witness testimony inconsistencies and the fact that she lived elsewhere during the alleged employment period. The court upheld the lower courts' assessment that the evidence was sufficient to determine the work duration without further verification, ruling that the procedural arguments failed to justify a retrial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 5 KPC; Art. 212 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 12 KPC: A cassation appeal based on alleged procedural violations is dismissed if the lower courts conducted a complete evidentiary process and their assessment of witness credibility and facts was reasonable within the bounds of logical reasoning and life experience.