II UKN 26/96
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to exclusion of crucial medical evidence affecting disability pension outcome.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Henryk K. against a lower court's denial of his disability pension. The appellant argued that the exclusion of new expert medical opinions violated procedural rules and distorted the factual findings regarding his condition. The court rejected this claim, noting that the existing evidence was sufficient to determine that his pre-existing conditions did not constitute disability at the time of the decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 11 ust. 3 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: The exclusion of evidence on disputed facts having significant importance for the case constitutes a violation of essential procedural rules that may justify cassation if it could have decisively influenced the outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
disability pension
exclusion of evidence
cassation appeal
procedural violation
expert medical opinion
factual findings
disability assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 11 ust. 3 of the Act of 1 March 1996 on amending the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 23 and 24 ust. 2 of the Act of 14 December 1982 on pension provision for employees and their families