Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 26/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal due to exclusion of crucial medical evidence affecting disability pension outcome.

Case Number II UKN 26/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Henryk K. against a lower court's denial of his disability pension. The appellant argued that the exclusion of new expert medical opinions violated procedural rules and distorted the factual findings regarding his condition. The court rejected this claim, noting that the existing evidence was sufficient to determine that his pre-existing conditions did not constitute disability at the time of the decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 ust. 3 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: The exclusion of evidence on disputed facts having significant importance for the case constitutes a violation of essential procedural rules that may justify cassation if it could have decisively influenced the outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension exclusion of evidence cassation appeal procedural violation expert medical opinion factual findings disability assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 11 ust. 3 of the Act of 1 March 1996 on amending the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 23 and 24 ust. 2 of the Act of 14 December 1982 on pension provision for employees and their families

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text