II UKN 24/96
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal for failure to state grounds and justify legal violations under Civil Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal because the applicant failed to specify the grounds for cassation and justify the alleged procedural violations. The applicant challenged a lower court's refusal to grant early retirement based on insufficient work history, arguing factual errors regarding employment at a farm. The court ruled that without specific grounds and a detailed explanation of the legal breach, the appeal cannot be substantively examined and must be rejected as inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1, 3, 5, 8, 11, 12 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal must clearly state its grounds and justify the alleged violation of law or procedure; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible and precludes substantive review.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
inadmissible grounds
Civil Procedure Code
procedural violation
justification requirement
substantive review
dismissal of appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 8 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 11 k.p.c.
art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedC.III 31/37