Supreme Court dismisses cassation, ruling individual law firm practice is not business activity for social security purposes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej Z. against the Social Insurance Fund regarding his social security obligations. The applicant argued that running a private law firm constitutes business activity, while the court found that specific provisions of the Advocates Act grant lawyers equal pension rights with employees. Consequently, the court held that individual law practice cannot be equated with business activity under the relevant social security regulations.