II UKN 14/96
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes social security decision for violating procedural rules by relying solely on applicant's testimony.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's decision regarding social security coverage due to a violation of procedural rules. The lower court established facts based exclusively on the applicant's testimony while ignoring other relevant evidence, such as witness statements from the company president and other employees. The court ruled that this failure to exhaust evidentiary means constituted a procedural error capable of significantly influencing the case outcome.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 299 KPC; Art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniach społecznych: Relying solely on one party's testimony without considering other essential evidence violates procedural rules if the omission could materially affect the case result.
Keywords
AI generated
social security coverage
procedural violation
evidence exhaustion
sole testimony reliance
casation grounds
labor relationship
full-time employment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
Art. 299 KPC
Art. 4 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 25 listopada 1986 r. o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych