Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review due to lack of gross legal error in administrative decision.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Minister of Justice against the Supreme Administrative Court's decision. The review challenged a 1995 land restitution decision based on alleged procedural flaws and reliance on a contradictory 1948 circular regarding agricultural land classification. The court found no gross violation of law, noting the administrative body correctly evaluated existing evidence and the time limits for new expert opinions had expired.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 21 § 1 KPA; Art. 21 § 2 KPA: An extraordinary review is admissible only upon proof of a gross violation of law, which was not established here as the administrative decision was based on a comprehensive evaluation of evidence and did not suffer from such a defect.