Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 10/96 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes conflicting rulings on pension rights due to violation of legal order.

Case Number II URN 10/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed a lower court's decision and the Social Security Office's ruling after finding contradictory judgments on the same pension claim. The Social Security Office denied early retirement based on a 30-year work requirement, while a prior final judgment had granted it based on care periods for an invalid father. The court ruled that issuing a new decision contradicting a final judgment without new evidence violated the legal order and public interest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 369 pkt 3 KPC; Art. 11 ust. 5 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; The existence of two contradictory substantive court rulings on the same claim between the same parties, without changed factual or legal circumstances, violates the legal order and public interest, justifying extraordinary review.

Keywords

AI generated
contradictory judgments extraordinary review legal order violation public interest pension rights final judgment social security office

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 369 pkt 3 KPC
Art. 11 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 422 § 1 KPC
Art. 365 KPC
Art. 366 KPC
Art. 419 § 2 KPC
Art. 80 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text