Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AZP 2/96 AI generated

Supreme Court held that trading receivables by a commercial company is not a banking act requiring license unless using others' funds.

Case Number III AZP 2/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether trading receivables constitutes a banking act requiring a license from the National Bank. The petitioner argued that such transactions, involving debt collection for profit, fell under banking activities prohibited without authorization. The Court ruled that trading receivables is not a banking act unless the company uses others' funds, as it does not involve the risks characteristic of banking operations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 ust. 1 Prawo bankowe; Art. 11 ust. 59 Prawo bankowe: Trading receivables by a commercial company is not a banking act requiring a license unless it involves using others' funds.

Keywords

AI generated
trading receivables banking act definition commercial company license others funds usage National Bank authorization tax fee civil acts financial risk supervision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 11 ust. 1 of the Banking Act
Art. 11 ust. 59 of the Banking Act
Art. 3 ust. 1 pkt 5 lit. a of the Tax Fee Act
Art. 7 ust. 1 pkt 2 of the VAT Act
art. 61 Konstytucji
art. 555 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 20/92

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text