Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 22/96 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes lower court rulings for failing to examine husband's pension status before suspending wife's disability pension.

Case Number II URN 22/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the appealed judgment and remanded the case for retrial because lower courts failed to investigate the husband's pension status. The applicant argued that her husband's entitlement to a worker's pension should have triggered a partial suspension of her disability pension under specific insurance regulations. The court held that omitting this crucial fact rendered the previous decisions premature and legally flawed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 28 ust. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; The court must examine all relevant circumstances, including a spouse's pension rights, before suspending a farmer's disability benefit.

Keywords

AI generated
agricultural disability pension spousal pension rights partial suspension rule premature judgment social insurance law remand for retrial factual omission

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 28 ust. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 28 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 28 ust. 5-7 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 316 § 1 KPC
Art. 422 § 2 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text