II URN 22/96
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes lower court rulings for failing to examine husband's pension status before suspending wife's disability pension.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the appealed judgment and remanded the case for retrial because lower courts failed to investigate the husband's pension status. The applicant argued that her husband's entitlement to a worker's pension should have triggered a partial suspension of her disability pension under specific insurance regulations. The court held that omitting this crucial fact rendered the previous decisions premature and legally flawed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 28 ust. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; The court must examine all relevant circumstances, including a spouse's pension rights, before suspending a farmer's disability benefit.
Keywords
AI generated
agricultural disability pension
spousal pension rights
partial suspension rule
premature judgment
social insurance law
remand for retrial
factual omission
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 28 ust. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 28 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 28 ust. 5-7 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 316 § 1 KPC
Art. 422 § 2 KPC