Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review when rent authority changes decision to grant claim before review filing.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the First President of the Supreme Court against an appellate court ruling. The applicant had previously lost a dispute over railway pension calculation, but the regional railway authority subsequently issued a new decision granting his claim based on a specific two-month extension rule. The court ruled that because the administrative body had already satisfied the applicant's request before the review was lodged, the proceedings were rendered unnecessary and thus inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 477 § 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Art. 80 § 1 of the Pensions Act: Extraordinary review proceedings must be dismissed if the administrative authority changes its decision to grant the claim before the review is filed.