Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 14/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review when rent authority changes decision to grant claim before review filing.

Case Number II URN 14/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the First President of the Supreme Court against an appellate court ruling. The applicant had previously lost a dispute over railway pension calculation, but the regional railway authority subsequently issued a new decision granting his claim based on a specific two-month extension rule. The court ruled that because the administrative body had already satisfied the applicant's request before the review was lodged, the proceedings were rendered unnecessary and thus inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 477 § 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Art. 80 § 1 of the Pensions Act: Extraordinary review proceedings must be dismissed if the administrative authority changes its decision to grant the claim before the review is filed.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review dismissal of proceedings administrative decision change pension calculation railway workers claim satisfaction procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 477 § 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Art. 80 § 1 of the Pensions Act
Art. 6 of the Pensions Act for Railway Workers
Act on Valuation of Pensions and Allowances

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text