Supreme Court dismisses judge disqualification request based solely on professional relationship with court president, rejecting procedural review of lower court actions.

The Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's request to disqualify judges from the case, ruling that the reviewing court cannot examine the legality of proceedings conducted by the adjudicating court. The defendant argued judges lacked impartiality due to their professional relationship with the court president and alleged psychological pressure, while judges confirmed no personal ties existed. The court held that professional relationships do not equate to personal connections requiring disqualification under the Civil Procedure Code and that the defendant's assumptions about the judges' objectivity were unfounded.