Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 7/96 AI generated

Short-term sick pay does not equate to sick benefit for pension start date purposes under Polish law.

Case Number II UZP 7/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question regarding whether short-term sick pay qualifies as sick benefit for pension eligibility. The petitioner argued that receiving wages during a brief illness period should count as receiving sick benefits, but the Social Insurance Institution contended these are distinct financial instruments. The court ruled that because the relevant statutes do not equate these payments, the pension right arises only upon stopping the sick pay, not the sick benefit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 92 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 76 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym: Receiving short-term sick pay is not equivalent to receiving sick benefit for the purpose of determining the start date of a pension.

Keywords

AI generated
short-term sick pay pension eligibility sick benefit distinction social insurance law wages during illness

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 92 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 76 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 14 ust. 1 ustawy zasiłkowej
Art. 5 ust. 1 i 2 oraz 6 ust. 1 ustawy zasiłkowej
Art. 8 ustawy zasiłkowej
Art. 391 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text