Competency dispute dismissed as different legal bases and factual circumstances exist between cases.

The Collegium of Competency at the Supreme Court rejected the applicant's request to determine the competent authority for a new case regarding tree protection. The applicant argued that a previous Supreme Court decision established administrative jurisdiction, but the court found the current dispute involved distinct legal grounds and factual circumstances compared to the prior case. Consequently, the court ruled that no competency dispute existed under the relevant procedural law because the matters were not identical.