Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PA 1/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in lawyer disciplinary cases, ruling only extraordinary review applies.

Case Number I PA 1/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by lawyer Mark T. against a final disciplinary decision, ruling that cassation is not available for such cases. The court noted that while the Criminal Procedure Code introduced cassation for criminal proceedings, the Lawyers Act specifically preserved the institution of extraordinary review for disciplinary matters. Consequently, the court applied the rules of extraordinary review rather than cassation, deeming the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 4 of the Act amending the Criminal Procedure Code; Art. 91 of the Lawyers Act: Although the Criminal Procedure Code introduced cassation, the Lawyers Act preserves extraordinary review for disciplinary proceedings, making cassation inadmissible for final disciplinary decisions against lawyers.

Keywords

AI generated
lawyer disciplinary proceedings extraordinary review cassation inadmissibility Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural law distinction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 26 ust. 5 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 19 listopada 1983 r. w sprawie postępowania dyscyplinarnego przeciwko adwokatom i aplikantom adwokackim
art. 9 i 357 KPK
art. 4 ustawy z dnia 29 czerwca 1995 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania karnego
art. 91 ustawy z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. Prawo o adwokaturze
art. 463 § 1 KPK

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Sąd Wojewódzki w P. z dnia 20 maja 1994 r.
Sąd Apelacyjny w P. z dnia 17 lutego 1995 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text