I PRN 44/96
AI generated
Employer succession under Art. 23-1 KP binds new employer to existing collective reward rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court partially allowed the plaintiffs' claim for profit-based bonuses by overturning the lower court's decision. The plaintiffs argued that the new state agency successor was bound by the old collective reward system, while the defendant contended the calculation period was invalid. The court ruled that the new employer automatically assumed the old reward rules but correctly identified that the bonus calculation period was limited to the profitable second half of 1992.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 § 2 k.p.; Upon acquisition of an enterprise, the new employer is bound by the individual employment contract terms and collective reward systems of the acquired enterprise.
Keywords
AI generated
employer succession
profit bonus
collective reward system
labor law
enterprise acquisition
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 23 ust. 1 § 2 k.p.
Art. 422 § 1 KPC
Art. 241 ust. 8 § 1 k.p.
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PZP 65/92