Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review due to procedural errors that did not harm the applicant's rights.

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the Supreme Administrative Court's decision regarding social assistance benefits. Although the lower court violated procedural rules by failing to address specific requests and missing statutory deadlines, these errors did not cause any harm to the applicant since the one-time benefit had already been consumed. Consequently, the court held that such non-fundamental procedural defects do not warrant overturning a final judgment.