III ARN 12/96
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review regarding retroactive unemployment benefit eligibility under new law.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by Hildegarda W. against a decision denying her unemployment benefits. The applicant argued that the new law's short 14-day transition period unfairly deprived her of rights established under the previous statute. The court ruled that the legislature's decision to shorten the transition period was a valid legislative choice and that the subsequent amendment did not validate the extraordinary review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 421 § 1 KPC; The legislature may shorten the transition period for new laws, and a subsequent amendment does not legitimize an extraordinary review challenging the original decision based on that short period.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review dismissal
unemployment benefit eligibility
transition period validity
retroactive law application
legislative discretion
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 421 § 1 KPC
Art. 23 ust. 1 pkt 2 lit. a ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1994 r. o zatrudnieniu i przeciwdziałaniu bezrobociu
Art. 20 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 16 października 1991 r. o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 22 grudnia 1995 r.