Administrative body's negative response does not constitute a claim of incompetence for jurisdictional dispute.

The Supreme Court dismissed Halina P.'s request to resolve a jurisdictional dispute between labor offices. Although the applicant claimed both administrative bodies refused to handle her case, the courts found that the offices explicitly stated their negative positions and denied her benefits. The court ruled that a mere refusal to grant benefits does not equate to a claim of incompetence, as the offices retained functional and substantive jurisdiction over the matter.