Supreme Court dismisses legal question due to factual error and lack of same-witnesses specification.

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question because the appellate court's reasoning regarding changed witness testimony did not match the specific wording of the question submitted. The material facts involved a pension agency re-evaluating witness statements to classify seasonal work as irregular, leading to the revocation of a previously granted disability pension. The court ruled that the legal issue was inadmissible because the question failed to specify that the same witnesses provided contradictory testimony, and the factual basis for the question lay outside the established record.