Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZP 22/95 AI generated

Supreme Court rules cooperative store is not a socialized workplace for work accident compensation purposes.

Case Number II UZP 22/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a food cooperative qualifies as a socialized workplace for work accident compensation. The Social Insurance Institution denied Janina Ś.'s claim because the accident was not reported immediately, while the plaintiff argued the cooperative's social activities made it a socialized entity. The court held that the statutory definition of a socialized workplace does not apply to cooperatives and that work accident benefits are owed to all employers regardless of their socialized status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; A cooperative enterprise is not considered a socialized workplace within the meaning of the cited provision, and work accident compensation applies to all employers irrespective of their socialized status.

Keywords

AI generated
socialized workplace definition work accident compensation cooperative enterprise status Social Insurance Institution powers immediate accident reporting employer liability scope statutory interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 1 pkt 1 of the Act of June 12, 1975 on benefits in respect of work accidents and occupational diseases
Art. 16 of the Labour Code
Act of March 4, 1994 on the fund for social benefits
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 3 k.p
art. 16 k.p
art. 44 k.c
art. 300 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text