Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRZN 1/96 AI generated

Trade union registration allowed despite similar name if distinct identification is possible in legal trade.

Case Number I PRZN 1/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision filed by the Minister of Justice against the registration of a regional trade union named 'Solidarity 80'. The union argued that its name infringed upon the rights of the national 'Solidarity 80' union, claiming the lower court failed to verify the proper representation of the national body. The court ruled that registration is permissible even with similar names provided the new union can be legally identified and distinguished from others, and the procedural defect regarding representation did not warrant overturning the decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 401 ust. 2 k.p.c.; Art. 397 k.p.c.; Trade union registration is permitted even if the name resembles another union's name, provided the new union can be identified in legal traffic and distinguished from others, and procedural defects in representing the national body do not justify extraordinary revision.

Keywords

AI generated
trade union registration similar name distinction extraordinary revision legal identification procedural representation freedom of association Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 401 ust. 2 k.p.c.
Art. 397 k.p.c.
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 410 k.p.c.
Art. 411 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie z dnia 19 marca 1996 r.
Sąd Wojewódzki w Warszawie z dnia 28 lipca 1995 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text