Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II UR 1/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses family pension claim when deceased had no actual employment period, only equivalent service.

Case Number II UR 1/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the widow's appeal for a family pension, overturning the lower court's decision. The deceased husband worked in agriculture and served in the Polish army but had no formal employment contract. The court ruled that military service counts as equivalent work but does not substitute for the mandatory period of actual employment required by law. Consequently, the statutory conditions for the pension were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 11 ust. 2 pkt 10 ustawy o zmianie niektórych przepisów o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym: Actual employment periods are strictly required for pension eligibility; equivalent service periods cannot substitute for the existence of a formal employment relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension eligibility actual employment period equivalent service periods military service recognition social security law pension conditions employment relationship

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 26 ust. 1 pkt 2 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 11 ust. 2 pkt 10 of the Act amending certain provisions on pension provision
Art. 17 ust. 2 in conjunction with Art. 1 pkt 1 of the Act on Social Security for Individual Farmers and Their Family Members
Art. 390 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text