II PRN 4/96
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary revision for lack of egregious legal error or state interest violation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision filed by the Solidarity Union against final labor court judgments. The Union argued that lower courts erred in finding the plaintiff's stroke was not a work accident, but the court found no evidence of a glaring legal violation. The decision emphasized that extraordinary review is exceptional and requires proof of a violation so severe it undermines the rule of law or harms the state's interest.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 417 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.; Extraordinary revision is limited to glaring legal errors or state interest violations, requiring proof of consequences incompatible with rule of law requirements.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary revision
glaring legal error
state interest violation
rule of law
labor accident
medical negligence
burden of proof
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 417 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 417 § 1 k.p.c
art. 368 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c