Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 15/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses dismissal of severance pay claim by shareholder employee due to flawed statutory interpretation.

Case Number I PRN 15/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the extraordinary review against a lower court's decision denying severance pay to an employee-shareholder. The lower courts incorrectly applied the law, ruling that the employee's status as a shareholder and the company's acquisition of assets barred the severance payment. The Supreme Court clarified that the statutory exclusion applies only when a third party acquires assets and then terminates the contract, not when the employer itself acquires assets and terminates the employment relationship.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn dotyczących zakładu pracy; The statutory exclusion of severance pay for a shareholder employee applies only when a third party acquires the plant's assets and subsequently terminates the employment, not when the employer acquires the assets and terminates the contract itself.

Keywords

AI generated
severance pay exclusion employee shareholder status plant asset acquisition extraordinary review labor law interpretation termination of employment Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 3 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving labor relations with employees due to reasons related to the plant and on amending certain acts
Art. 8 ust. 3 pkt 5 of the Act of December 28, 1989 on special rules for resolving labor relations with employees due to reasons related to the plant and on amending certain acts
Art. 422 § 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 229 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PRN 20/93

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text