Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 66/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review; administrative court lacks power to review service opinion content.

Case Number III ARN 66/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed an extraordinary review against a decision to release a prison officer from service. The officer argued that the administrative court should have controlled the service opinion's compliance with specific formatting requirements. The court ruled that while the administrative court can check for jurisdictional errors, it lacks the authority to review the substantive content or evaluation methods within the service opinion itself.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 60 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o Służbie Więziennej; Art. 76 § 1 k.p.a.: The administrative court is not competent to control the content, evaluation, or manner of forming a service opinion; its jurisdiction is limited to verifying whether the opinion was issued by a competent organ.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative court jurisdiction service opinion review extraordinary review dismissal prison service release content control limitation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 60 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1959 r. o Służbie Więziennej
art. 76 § 1 k.p.a.
art. 211 k.p.a.
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
§ 3 zarządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 1 marca 1990 r.
art. 196 § 1 k.p
art. 76 § 1 k.p
art. 211 k.p
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text