Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 65/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review, ruling ex lege perpetual use does not arise if return conditions met before transfer date.

Case Number III ARN 65/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the administrative decision regarding the return of expropriated land. The plaintiff, a former owner, sought return of the property after the state entity failed to utilize it for its intended school purpose. The court held that acquiring perpetual use ex lege does not occur if the legal prerequisites for returning the land to the original owner were already met before the transfer date.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 69 ust. 1 ustawy o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości; Art. 2 ust. 1 ustawy o zmianie ustawy o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczeniu nieruchomości: The acquisition of perpetual use ex lege does not occur if the conditions for returning the expropriated property to the former owner were met prior to the transfer date.

Keywords

AI generated
expropriated land return perpetual use acquisition extraordinary review dismissal state entity management legal prerequisites timing

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 69 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 kwietnia 1985 r. o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości
Art. 2 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 września 1990 r. o zmianie ustawy o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczeniu nieruchomości
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 97 § 1 pkt 4 k.p
art. 207 § 5 k.p
art. 77 k.p
art. 236 k.c
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text