Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review due to lack of interest and procedural time bar.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Minister of Labour against a lower court's judgment awarding back pay. The plaintiff argued for higher wages based on collective agreements, while the defendant claimed the lower court failed to assess financial capacity. The court ruled that since the awarded amounts were already paid and spent, there was no interest for the state to recover, and the review was also time-barred.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 213 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 409 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.: An extraordinary review is inadmissible if the judgment does not raise serious doubts requiring further fact-finding and if the state has no interest in recovering amounts already lawfully paid and consumed by the claimant.