III ARN 61/95
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review for not deviating from prior case law on administrative consent forms.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Bankruptcy Administrator against the Chief Administrative Court's decision. The Administrator argued that the Chief Court's ruling on the form of administrative consent violated specific civil code provisions. The Court held that departing from established precedent without a compelling reason does not constitute a flagrant violation of law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 207 § 5 k.p.a.; Art. 179 § 1 k.c.: A decision by the Supreme Court not to deviate from established case law does not amount to a flagrant violation of law unless the prior precedent is clearly erroneous or obsolete.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary review
flagrant violation of law
precedent deviation
administrative consent
property rights
civil law regulation
administrative autonomy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 207 § 5 k.p.a.
Art. 179 § 1 k.c.
Art. 104 § 1 k.p.a.
Art. 207 § 3 k.p.a.
Art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.a.
Art. 2b ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 września 1990 r. o zmianie ustawy o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczeniu nieruchomości
art. 207 § 5 k.p
art. 179 § 1 k.c
art. 104 § 1 k.p
art. 207 § 3 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII SA 649/88