Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II URN 59/95 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes disability pension ruling due to incomplete medical documentation and procedural errors.

Case Number II URN 59/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's decision denying a family pension to Edward B., finding the judgment violated statutory requirements regarding disability classification. The lower court incorrectly determined the disability arose after age 25 without considering that the applicant completed school before turning 16. The Court ruled that the medical file was incomplete, lacking crucial hospital records from the relevant period, and remanded the case for a full evidentiary review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 39 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.: The court must gather all existing medical documentation from the relevant period when determining the date of disability; a judgment based on incomplete medical records constitutes a flagrant violation of law and must be quashed for remand.

Keywords

AI generated
family pension entitlement disability classification incomplete medical records flagrant violation of law remand for retrial procedural error special school completion

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 39 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text