I PRN 103/95
AI generated
Special union protection does not bar labor court from ex officio choosing alternative claims if primary claim is unreasonable.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary revision against a labor court's decision to award damages instead of reinstatement. The plaintiff, a union official, argued for reinstatement after being fired for drinking alcohol at work, while the employer contended this violated social norms. The court ruled that special legal protection for union officials does not prevent the labor court from selecting an alternative claim when the requested reinstatement is unjustified.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 477 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 56 k.p.; Special legal protection for union officials does not exclude the labor court's power to ex officio select an alternative claim if the primary claim is unreasonable and contradicts social coexistence principles.
Keywords
AI generated
labor law
union official
reinstatement
alternative claim
social norms
extraordinary revision
ex officio selection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 477 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 57 § 2 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 94 pkt 9 k.p.
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 481 k.c.
art. 477 § 2 k.p.c