Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SW 1091/95 AI generated

Supreme Court allows presidential election protest for false education claim potentially influencing vote results.

Case Number III SW 1091/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed a protest against the election of Aleksander Kwaśniewski based on a false claim of higher education on his ballot. Voters argued this misinformation, which highlighted Kwaśniewski's advantage over Lech Wałęsa, could have influenced the election outcome. Although experts could not quantify the exact impact, the Court ruled that the mere possibility of such influence satisfied the legal threshold for a valid protest.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 41 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta RP; Art. 43 ustawy o wyborze Prezydenta RP: A protest is admissible if a false statement regarding a candidate's qualifications could have influenced the election result, regardless of whether the exact magnitude of that influence can be scientifically measured.

Keywords

AI generated
presidential election protest false candidate qualification education misrepresentation influence on vote count validity of protest electoral law violation potential impact assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 41 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 43 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 219 k.p.c.
art. 13 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 75 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 27 września 1990 r. o wyborze Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej
art. 13 § 2 k.p.c
art. 267 k.k

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text