Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 42/95 AI generated

Supreme Court voids appeal judgment due to lack of service proof and remands for re-evaluation under old social security law.

Case Number II URN 42/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the appeal judgment void because the appellant, acting without a lawyer, failed to provide proof of receiving the court summons. The court found that the applicant's claim for disability pension under the 1982 Act was valid since the application predated the new 1990 Act, and the medical assessment confirmed eligibility. Consequently, the case was remanded to the lower court for a new trial to fully evaluate the applicant's rights under the previous legislation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 109 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; Art. 369 pkt 5, Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.: A judgment rendered despite the lack of proof of service of the notice of the hearing term to a party acting without a lawyer is void.

Keywords

AI generated
void judgment lack of service proof social security law disability pension retroactive application remand for retrial procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 109 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 369 pkt 5 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 16 ust. 1a ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników indywidualnych i członków ich rodzin
art. 393 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 378 k.p.c
art. 369 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text