III ARN 54/95
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses unemployment benefit denial based on prior illegal administrative decisions violating legal principles.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim regarding the denial of unemployment benefits for inability to work. The applicant argued that denying benefits solely because he did not receive prior benefits due to earlier illegal administrative decisions violated fundamental legal principles. The court held that such a causal chain of denials based on prior unlawful acts was incompatible with the rule of law and administrative procedure standards.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu; Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego: Denial of unemployment benefits for inability to work based solely on prior benefits not received due to earlier illegal administrative decisions violates fundamental legal principles and administrative procedure rules.
Keywords
AI generated
unemployment benefits
inability to work
illegal administrative decisions
rule of law
administrative procedure
Supreme Court
benefit entitlement
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 20 ust. 12 ustawy o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu
art. 15 ust. 9 ustawy o zatrudnieniu i bezrobociu
art. 156 § 1 pkt 3 kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego
art. 128 k.p.a.
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 145 § 1 pkt 5 k.p
art. 156 § 1 pkt 3 k.p
art. 9 k.p
art. 145 § 1 k.p
art. 128 k.p