Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 50/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses dismissal of tax penalty proceedings when tax debt is enforced via bank account seizure.

Case Number III ARN 50/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the taxpayer's request to terminate the proceedings regarding overdue tax penalties because the debt had already been enforced through a bank account seizure. The court held that administrative enforcement does not equate to voluntary payment and thus does not render the administrative proceedings for penalty dismissal without subject matter. Consequently, the lower court's decision to terminate the case was overturned to ensure the taxpayer's right to a substantive review of their request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 26 ust. 1 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych; Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych: The forced enforcement of a tax obligation does not constitute voluntary payment and cannot automatically justify the dismissal of administrative proceedings seeking the termination of overdue tax penalties.

Keywords

AI generated
tax penalty dismissal enforcement proceedings bank account seizure voluntary payment subject matter existence substantive review tax liability extinction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 26 ust. 1 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych
Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych
Art. 5 ust. 3 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 105 § 1 k.p
art. 105 k.p
art. 104 § 1 k.p
art. 104 § 2 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III ARN 75/94 OSNAPiUS 1995 nr 9 poz. 106

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text