II URN 43/95
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review due to insufficient work history for disability pension eligibility under Article 32 of the Pension Act.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Ombudsman against a lower court's denial of a disability pension. The applicant failed to meet the five-year work requirement for employees over thirty, as her total qualifying period was only three years and eight months. The court upheld the lower court's finding that the applicant did not satisfy the statutory conditions for the pension benefit.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin; Art. 4 ust. 1 pkt 6 lit. a oraz ust. 2 ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent; extraordinary review dismissed where the applicant fails to fulfill the mandatory work period requirement for disability pension eligibility.
Keywords
AI generated
disability pension eligibility
work history requirement
extraordinary review dismissal
pension law provisions
insufficient service period
Ombudsman review
statutory conditions
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 32 ust. 1 pkt 5 of the Act on Pension Provision for Employees and Their Families
Art. 4 ust. 1 pkt 6 lit. a and ust. 2 of the Act on Revaluation of Pensions and Allowances
Art. 25 of the Act on Pension Provision for Railway Employees and Their Families
art. 278 § 1 k.p.c
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c