Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 30/95 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that a teacher reinstated after unjust dismissal under Art. 20 K.N. is entitled to unemployment pay under Art. 57 of the Labor Code.

Case Number I PZP 30/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a teacher reinstated after an unjust dismissal under Article 20 of the Teachers' Card is entitled to unemployment compensation under Article 47 or 57 of the Labor Code. The court determined that the specific termination procedure in the Teachers' Card precludes the application of the general unemployment pay provision in Article 47. Consequently, the court ruled that the teacher must claim unemployment compensation under Article 57 of the Labor Code in conjunction with Article 98 of the Teachers' Card.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 20 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela; Art. 47, 57 Kodeksu pracy, Art. 98 Karty Nauczyciela: A teacher dismissed under the specific procedure of Article 20 of the Teachers' Card is entitled to unemployment compensation under Article 57 of the Labor Code, not Article 47, as the specific statutory regime excludes the general provision.

Keywords

AI generated
Teachers' Card dismissal unemployment compensation Labor Code Article 57 reinstatement of teacher systemic legal coherence

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 20 ust. 1 Karty Nauczyciela
Art. 47 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 57 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 98 Karty Nauczyciela
Ustawa z dnia 28 grudnia 1989 r. o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 57 § 1 k.p
art. 57 k.p
art. 47 k.p
art. 300 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text