Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III ARN 46/95 AI generated

Military lawyers' salary increase request dismissed as military service law prevails over bar association law.

Case Number III ARN 46/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed Alfred J.'s appeal regarding his request to upgrade his military lawyer's salary from group U-13 to U-9. The lower courts had rejected the claim, arguing that military service regulations excluded the application of the Lawyers Act to active-duty officers. The Supreme Court ruled that Article 75(3) of the Lawyers Act automatically excludes its provisions for military lawyers, meaning the specific salary rules for military personnel govern their compensation instead.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 75 ust. 3 ustawy o radcach prawnych: The provisions of the Lawyers Act regarding salary do not apply to lawyers serving in active military duty, as Article 75(3) excludes them by operation of law, requiring application of separate military remuneration statutes.

Keywords

AI generated
military lawyers salary classification active service statutory exclusion remuneration law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 22 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 75 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 11 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o uposażeniu żołnierzy
§ 12 zarządzenia Nr 10/MON Ministra Obrony Narodowej z dnia 29 marca 1993 r.
art. 207 § 1 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text