Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 17/95 AI generated

Social security benefit statute's six-month limitation period does not bar payment if civil code interruption applies.

Case Number II URN 17/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland overturned a lower court decision denying a sick benefit to a business owner due to unpaid social security contributions. Although the statutory limitation period for the benefit had expired, the court found that the applicant's request for payment interrupted the limitation period under civil law. Consequently, the court ruled that the benefit must be paid because the subsequent payment of arrears under a conditional installment plan was valid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 54 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego; Art. 123 § 1 k.c.: The six-month limitation period for social security benefits does not preclude their payment if the limitation period was interrupted by a claim for payment and the debt was subsequently settled under a conditional installment plan.

Keywords

AI generated
social security benefits limitation period interruption of limitation conditional installment plan sick benefit entitlement supreme court review social insurance law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 54 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 16 ustawy z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą i ich rodzin
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 123 § 1 k.c.
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 123 k.c
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 177 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 118 k.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text