Supreme Court rules that building and selling a house to adult children does not justify eviction of a police officer's assigned apartment.

The Supreme Court dismissed the legal question regarding whether a police officer's construction and sale of a house to adult children constitutes a valid ground for eviction under specific regulations. The court found that the officer built the house using state funds and sold it to his adult daughters, who were no longer considered dependents under the Police Act. The court decided that the literal and functional interpretation of the internal regulation required strict adherence to its specific criteria, which were not met by this scenario.