Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 67/95 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes labor opinion for failure to inform employee and hear union views per Art 98 § 5 Labor Code.

Case Number I PRN 67/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed lower court rulings that rejected a teacher's request to correct her work opinion. The court found the employer failed to fulfill statutory obligations under Article 98 § 5 of the Labor Code by not informing the employee of the draft opinion or hearing union views. Consequently, the court held that such a defective opinion does not exist and remanded the case for a new opinion to be issued.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 98 § 5 k.p.; Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.: Failure to inform the employee of the draft work opinion and to hear the views of the trade union organization constitutes a procedural defect rendering the opinion non-existent and providing grounds for requesting a new opinion.

Keywords

AI generated
Labor Code Article 98 Work Opinion Procedure Trade Union Views Procedural Defect Remand for New Opinion Labor Code Article 422 Supreme Court Review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 98 § 5 k.p.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 98 § 5 k.p
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text