Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 18/95 AI generated

Cooperative members' surplus share rights depend on work contribution regardless of specific distribution method.

Case Number I PZP 18/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that cooperative members are entitled to a proportional share of the surplus based on their work contribution, even when distributed via interest or capital increases. The lower courts had initially invalidated internal rules restricting distribution to full-year employees, ordering proportional payments for partial-year members. The Court affirmed that all surplus distribution methods listed in the query constitute remuneration for work and must adhere to the statutory principle of proportionality to work input.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 183 § 1 Prawa spółdzielczego; Art. 77 § 2 Prawa spółdzielczego: All methods of distributing the surplus share designated for members, including interest and capital increases, constitute remuneration for work and must be allocated proportionally to the member's work contribution.

Keywords

AI generated
cooperative law surplus distribution work contribution proportional share member rights remuneration for work partial year employment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 183 § 1 Prawa spółdzielczego
Art. 77 § 2 Prawa spółdzielczego
Art. 75 Prawa spółdzielczego
Art. 76 § 1 Prawa spółdzielczego
art. 391 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text