Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 29/95 AI generated

Supreme Court allows unemployment period calculation despite missing three-year deadline due to lack of evidence gathering.

Case Number II URN 29/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court partially overturned the appellate court's decision, remanding the case for a retrial. The applicant argued that his unemployment period should be counted due to political repression, but the lower courts failed to gather sufficient evidence to prove he could not find work. The court ruled that the three-year deadline for proving unemployment is not a bar if the cause is demonstrated through all available means, and that the first-instance court violated procedural duties by not conducting a proper evidentiary hearing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 11 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 24 maja 1989 r. o przywróceniu praw pracowniczych; Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.: The failure to observe a three-year deadline for proving unemployment is not a bar to calculating the period if the cause is established via all admissible evidence, and courts must actively investigate all relevant circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
unemployment period calculation political repression evidence three-year deadline rule procedural duty to investigate social insurance benefits evidentiary hearing requirements remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 11 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 24 maja 1989 r. o przywróceniu praw pracowniczych osobom pozbawionym zatrudnienia za działalność związkową, samorządową, przekonania polityczne i religijne
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PZP 46/91

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text