Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 35/95 AI generated

Patent owner allowed to seek determination that production is not covered by patent under Art. 19 and 114 ust. 1.

Case Number I PRN 35/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Ombudsman against a Patent Office decision. The Coal Mine sought to determine that its raw coal production was not covered by a mining shovel patent, while the inventors argued the matter belonged to civil courts due to a separate royalty dispute. The Court held that the patent owner has a legitimate legal interest in establishing the scope of protection regardless of pending civil proceedings, thereby validating the administrative procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 19 ust. 1 ustawy o wynalazczości; Art. 114 ust. 1 ustawy o wynalazczości: A patent owner may request a determination that specific production is not covered by the patent, as this constitutes a legitimate legal interest independent of any concurrent civil dispute over remuneration.

Keywords

AI generated
patent scope determination legitimate legal interest extraordinary review dismissal patent office procedure inventor remuneration dispute administrative standing patent law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 19 ust. 1 ustawy o wynalazczości
Art. 114 ust. 1 ustawy o wynalazczości
Art. 421 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c
art. 24 k.c
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 421 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
SP 153/66
III PRN 5/86
PZP 1/77

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text