Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II URN 8/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review for lack of legal definition of forced labor during occupation. Court held work must be assessed based on physical coercion, deprivation of liberty, or life threat.

Case Number II URN 8/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed an extraordinary review regarding the calculation of a disability pension's contribution period. The applicant argued that seasonal work performed during the German occupation constituted forced labor, while the Social Insurance Institution and lower court found no evidence of such conditions. The court ruled that without a legal definition of forced labor, the lower court correctly rejected the claim based on the absence of physical coercion or life-threatening circumstances.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 2 ust. 2 pkt 2 lit. a ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent; Forced labor requires specific elements like physical coercion or life threat, and lack of a legal definition does not automatically classify all occupation-era work as forced labor.

Keywords

AI generated
forced labor definition disability pension calculation German occupation period extraordinary review dismissal contribution period assessment physical coercion requirement social insurance benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 2 ust. 2 pkt 2 lit. a ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent, o zasadach ustalania emerytur i rent oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text