Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PO 8/95 AI generated

Administrative court ruled that restoring sewage flow disputes fall under administrative law, not civil litigation.

Case Number III PO 8/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil lawsuit regarding the restoration of sewage flow, ruling that such disputes belong exclusively to administrative proceedings. The lower court had rejected the claim, citing the Water Law's designation of administrative bodies as competent for resolving these specific water-related disputes. The court affirmed that the general rule of administrative jurisdiction prevails, allowing civil court intervention only in exceptional cases involving damages from unauthorized permit actions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 36 ust. 1 Prawa wodnego; Art. 41 ust. 1, 3 Prawa wodnego; Art. 53 ust. 1, 2 pkt 2 Prawa wodnego: Disputes concerning the restoration of water relations to a previous state fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of administrative authorities, rendering civil litigation inadmissible except in exceptional cases involving damages from unauthorized permit actions.

Keywords

AI generated
administrative jurisdiction water law disputes sewage flow restoration civil litigation inadmissibility competency of administrative bodies

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 36 ust. 1 of the Water Law
Art. 41 ust. 1 and 3 of the Water Law
Art. 53 ust. 1 and 2 point 2 of the Water Law
art. 229 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II CR 253/79

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text