Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II URN 11/95 AI generated

Pension increase for double social insurance coverage does not justify recalculating pension under Art. 33 ust. 2.

Case Number II URN 11/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed the pensioner's request to increase his pension based on double social insurance coverage, overturning a lower court decision. The lower court incorrectly recalculated the pension duration by treating periods of agricultural insurance as non-contributory periods under Article 33, whereas the Supreme Court determined these periods were already accounted for under Article 15. Consequently, the court ruled that the pension must be increased without re-evaluating the total contribution years.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 15 ust. 3a; Art. 33 ust. 2 ustawy o rewaloryzacji: Pension increases granted for double social insurance coverage do not constitute a request to add non-contributory periods, thus precluding recalculation of the pension duration under Article 33.

Keywords

AI generated
pension recalculations double social insurance agricultural insurance revaluation law contribution periods supreme court review social benefits

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 15 ust. 3a ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent
Art. 33 ust. 2 ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent
Art. 5 pkt 1 lit. a ustawy z dnia 15 lutego 1992 r. o zmianie niektórych ustaw dotyczących zatrudnienia oraz zaopatrzenia emerytalnego
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 421 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 419 § 3 k.p.c
art. 421 § 2 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text