Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ARN 16/95 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review, ruling only property owners can request land division.

Case Number III ARN 16/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Minister of Justice against a lower court decision. The applicant, a landowner, argued that the administrative authority violated his property rights by approving a land division without his consent. The court held that only owners or perpetual usufructuaries possess the legal standing to initiate such a division, and since the applicant actively opposed the plan, he lacked the requisite title to request it.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 10 ust. 1 i 5 ustawy z dnia 29 kwietnia 1985 r. o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości; The right to request a land division under the specified statute is exclusively reserved for subjects holding a legal title of ownership or perpetual usufruct over the property in question.

Keywords

AI generated
extraordinary review land division property ownership standing to sue administrative law perpetual usufruct constitutional rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 10 ust. 1 i 5 ustawy z dnia 29 kwietnia 1985 r. o gospodarce gruntami i wywłaszczaniu nieruchomości
art. 207 § 5 k.p.a.
art. 1 Konstytucji
art. 7 Konstytucji
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 207 § 5 k.p
art. 28 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III ARN 58/93
Uchwała Pełnego Składu Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 29 marca 1993 r.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text