Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZP 13/95 AI generated

Police officers' claim for salary and interest before common courts is inadmissible due to constitutional interpretation.

Case Number I PZP 13/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court ruled that police officers cannot sue for salary arrears and interest before common courts or labor courts. The court determined that the prevailing interpretation of the law, established by the Constitutional Tribunal, does not bind lower courts. Consequently, the procedural path for such claims is deemed legally non-existent.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 13 ust. 3 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym; Art. 25 ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym: The prevailing interpretation of the law established by the Constitutional Tribunal does not bind common courts, as the legislature explicitly excluded judicial bodies from being bound by such interpretations.

Keywords

AI generated
prevailing interpretation of law Constitutional Tribunal binding common courts jurisdiction police officers salary procedural inadmissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 13 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
Art. 25 ustawy o Trybunale Konstytucyjnym
Art. 3 Konstytucji
Art. 1 Małej Konstytucji
art. 391 k.p.c
art. 481 § 1 k.c
art. 476 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 k.p
art. 5 k.p
art. 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text