Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PRN 20/95 AI generated

Supreme Court allows extraordinary review to determine if a previously unremunerated re-employed retiree is entitled to a one-time severance payment.

Case Number I PRN 20/95
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court granted an extraordinary review to overturn lower court rulings that denied a severance payment to a re-employed retiree. The plaintiff argued he had not received a prior severance, while the employer contended the law barred such payments for retirees returning to work. The Court ruled that the statutory provision only excludes a second payment if one was previously received, thereby remanding the case to clarify the employee's prior entitlement status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 18 ust. 1; Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1984 r. o zasadach tworzenia zakładowych systemów wynagradzania: A one-time severance payment is due upon re-employment of a retiree only if they had not previously received such payment, as the statutory exclusion applies solely to preventing duplicate payments within a career.

Keywords

AI generated
severance payment entitlement re-employed retiree rights extraordinary review procedure one-time payment rule labor law interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 18 ust. 2 w związku z art. 18 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1984 r. o zasadach tworzenia zakładowych systemów wynagradzania
art. 21 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 19 lipca 1990 r. o zmianie ustawy o zasadach tworzenia zakładowych systemów wynagradzania
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PRN 30/88

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text